As with anything involving the human brain, there’s no one-size-fits-all answer.
However at the recent VELG National VET Conference I had the pleasure of meeting Dr. Deniese Cox, who runs TeachingOnline.com.au (check out her free videos – they are awesome).
I also thoroughly enjoyed Deniese’s NVC conference workshop “10 Quick-Fire Findings from Research.”
One thing in particular stood out for me in this session, and that was the research she conducted on the duration of live online sessions (E.g. an online session facilitated over Zoom).
I was trying to find research on this earlier in the year for one Accellier’s free PD sessions and at the time I could not find much.
There’s a bit of good research into video duration for online courses, however questions around optimising interactive live session durations remained unanswered for me.
To be clear, Deniese did not set out to define precise online lesson lengths, but to understand better what goes on for students through the passage of time in a live session.
Deniese started by setting the scene for her research – that the 103 participants were in optimal settings to reduce cognitive load. This included:
In simple terms; the teaching and session structure were excellent and the learners were not overly distracted by their environment or tech issues.
Deniese’s research looked at short, medium and long live online sessions to compare the results. These were:
The research measured three key areas:
Let’s look at the results.
In one hour sessions, students:
In the two and a half hour sessions, students:
In the full day sessions, students:
I found the full-day session findings particularly interesting. The first conclusion we might draw from this might be to ask “is that final 90 minute session even worth it!?”
A better question to ask might be “how could we better utilise the last session in a day of online learning?”
Well Deniese explored this question with remarkable results…
Instead of delivering any new content in that last session of a full day of learning, Dr. Cox had the educators help learners to narrate, shape and expand notes from earlier in the day. Further, they had facilitated question and discussion time and the questions the learners were asking were so rich. The learning outcomes in this model were exceptionally high.
My favourite moment in the session was when Deniese said:
Again, there’s no one-size-fits all. However Dr. Cox’s research has given us a much better insight into what happens for learners when they participate in your online sessions.
The data from the research shows that under optimal conditions, less than two hours is a good duration.
We also learnt that for full-day online learning events that the time in the final session is better used for reviewing, narrating and expanding notes as well as facilitated questions and discussions.
If you want to see more of Dr. Deniese Cox’s research, check out her work at TeachingOnline.com.au.
One of the managers John Morriss added that one of the best aspects of the course was the use of real life examples that were relevant to his industry and role.
Baiada PoultryAccellier was approached to assist over 50 highly skilled professionals within the organisation achieve Certificate IV in Training and Assessment.
Department of Planning, Industry and EnvironmentMarion, a successful Accellier Certificate IV in Training and Assessment graduate tells her story.
Qualified visual arts trainer video